Page 43 - FSTE A5 Handbook

(1) Mapping GE Learning Outcomes against the Three Broad Categories of the Kereluik
(1) Mapping GE Learning Outcomes against the Three Broad Categories of the Kereluik
Framework
Framework
Since the nine subcategories (grouped into three broad categories) are not mutually
Since the nine subcategories (grouped into three broad categories) are not mutually
exclusive in the Kereluik Framework, the learning outcomes may match with more than one
exclusive in the Kereluik Framework, the learning outcomes may match with more than one
(1) Mapping GE Learning Outcomes against the Three Broad Categories of the
subcategory. To reflect accurately on the proportions of learning outcomes in each category,
Kereluik Framework

subcategory. To reflect accurately on the proportions of learning outcomes in each category,
Since the nine subcategories (grouped into three broad categories) are not mutually exclusive
it is important to calculate the fraction of each category (by the summation of counts in each
in the Kereluik Framework, the learning outcomes may match with more than one subcategory.
it is important to calculate the fraction of each category (by the summation of counts in each
To reflect accurately on the proportions of learning outcomes in each category, it is important
theme divided by the number of subcategories). Proportions of learning outcomes in each
to calculate the fraction of each category (by the summation of counts in each theme divided
theme divided by the number of subcategories). Proportions of learning outcomes in each
by the number of subcategories). Proportions of learning outcomes in each category of each
category of each institution were shown in Figure 2.
institution were shown in Figure 2.
category of each institution were shown in Figure 2.

U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8
U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7
U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 U8

Figure 2: The matching of GE learning outcomes in the eight UGC-funded universities with the
Figure 2: The matching of GE learning outcomes in the 8 UGC-funded universities with the 3 broad
Figure 2: The matching of GE learning outcomes in the 8 UGC-funded universities with the 3 broad
three broad themes of the 21 century learning framework

st
themes of the 21 Century learning st
st
themes of the 21 Century learning
Foundational
Foundational
Meta Meta Knowledge
Knowledge
Knowledge
Knowledge 26% 26%
37% 37%
Humanistic
Humanistic
Knowledge
Knowledge
37% 37%

Figure 3: The overall distribution of GE learning outcomes in the eight UGC-funded universities
Figure 3: The overall distribution of GE learning outcomes in the 8 UGC-funded universities against

against the three broad categories of the 21 century learning framework
st
Figure 3: The overall distribution of GE learning outcomes in the 8 UGC-funded universities against
st
the 3 broad categories of the 21 Century learning
the 3 broad categories of the 21 Century learning
st

32
32 30